The Listening Biennial is hosted in a remarkable variety of places which are far apart from each other. Is there a thought carrying on throughout one edition from one to the next of these places?
LB: We do provide a conceptual framework. For this year, it's on the idea of »Third Listening«. Mostly artists and institutions respond to the framework we propose. But at the same time, I'm interested if somebody comes to us and feels there's a meaningfulness for them in what we're doing in general. Then I'm always open to at least having a conversation and seeing if there's an interesting fit there. These days listening seems to be touching people in ways that feels quite urgent. It seems to be circulating across a range of cultural and social contexts, so I’m also aware that the Biennial can act as a transcultural home. I’m also very moved by how people do reach out because they find there's something to connect with.
What is this third kind of listening? And how does it relate to listening to the »humming of the twinkling stars« you refer to in the introduction to this year’s edition?
LB: The idea of Third Listening was developed through research we were doing into a number of fields. One was coming out of some theoretical as well as clinical work in the context of psychoanalysis, in which a number of writers, particularly Jessica Benjamin, elaborates ideas about the Third as a relational model of intersubjectivity and how we can partner in working through conflict, through trauma and finding ways of repairing, recovering and restoring. It's very much about a mutual recognition in which we acknowledge each other as partners in a process rather than understanding that one holds knowledge more than the other or has authority over the other. Benjamin’s writings were quite influential in terms of conceiving a sense of we-ness and how it can transform individual lives in profound ways.
From there we moved to looking into environmental and ecological projects and works which attempt to bring together human and more-than-human worlds to create what Gilles Clément calls a third landscape, which is more conducive to biodiversity and a certain flourishing of human to more-than-human connection.
Following these references, we thought that perhaps it’s important to conceive a third form of listening that is particularly generative and supportive or that helps foster these meeting points, these ways of moving toward others and finding a shared space between.
Can you give an example of how this Third Listening approach will be reflected in the events in Berlin?
LB: We commissioned audio works by artists from around the world over the last year to respond to this theme. There are different ways in which artists have been taking that on. Some artists who are very much involved with environmental practices or field recording and soundscape work, search for new ways of positioning themselves in relationship to what they record. Rather than being the invisible recordist who is capturing a field or sounds of an environment, they instead search for ways to interact, to participate, to be present in some form of dialogue or conversation with environments. This kind of relational approach echoes with notions of thirdness we’re exploring and results in an exciting range of sonic work.
Elena Lucca, an artist and environmentalist from Argentina, contributed a work in this direction. She has been quite instrumental in developing poetic research into voice and movement techniques in collaboration with her sister Kozana Lucca, that try to feel the body as being part of nature. Even though traditionally she doesn't necessarily work with sound she made a beautiful, very informal audio piece in which she's vocalizing or poeticizing with her surroundings.
Others are working with sociopolitical issues in different contexts. For example, we have quite a number of artists from the Indian subcontinent who are giving narrative to struggles in their personal lives or in larger historical contexts, working at questions of colonialism, questions of social discrimination and trying to open a more affirmative possibility to overcome this sense of opposition between an us and a them, to get away from this binary or this constant tension or inability to overcome certain polarities. This is also exemplary perhaps of a third form of listening, which is about shifting from an oppositional to a reparative politics.